United States v. Ayik

Bibliographic record

Publisher

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California

Published

May 28, 2021

Source type

Other

Research grade

Source grade P0

Language

English

Official record

Official publication

Address

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/59969866/united-states-v-ayik/

What it supports

The ANOM prosecution of Edwin Harmendra Kumar: United States v. Ayik, No. 3:21-cr-01623, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, filed 28 May 2021, the case in which Kumar was extradited to the Southern District of California from Australia and later sentenced by Judge Janis L. Sammartino - the docket behind pa_anom_kumar_sentenced and pa_anom_kumar_extradited.

Dataset id

src_courtlistener_us_v_ayik_kumar_docket

Research notes

• CourtListener/RECAP copy of the PACER docket; official true because the underlying record is the court's, though CourtListener is not the court's own site.
• published_on is the docket's date filed as shown on the record; a docket has no publication date of its own.
• The citing finding used a CourtListener REST search query rather than a page; that query resolves to this docket, which is the canonical public page and is recorded as the url.
• Docket id 59969866 is the RECAP record whose party list is 'USA, Edwin Harmendra Kumar'.
• CourtListener holds a separate RECAP docket record for each defendant in the same case number 3:21-cr-01623, plus a combined record (docket id 59968712) listing James Thomas Flood, Omar Malik, Osemah Elhassen, Aurangzeb Ayub, Baris Tukel, Joseph Hakan Ayik, Erkan Yusef Dogan, Shane Geoffrey May, Domenico Catanzariti, Seyyed Hossein Hosseini and Miwand Zakhimi. Per-defendant ids seen: 59969854 Ayik, 59969855 Catanzariti, 59969857 Hosseini, 59969858 Dmitrienko, 59969861 May, 59969862 Ayub, 59969864 Nikitovic, 59969865 Ngakuru, 59969866 Kumar, 59969867 Malik, 59969868 Zakhimi, 59969869 Elhassen.
• The two citing URLs are entry-text queries ('JUDGMENT as to Edwin Harmendra Kumar' and 'Arrest of Edwin Harmendra Kumar'). Both name docket entries inside this one docket; the docket page is the canonical citable source for both, so a single row covers them.
• The individual docket entries were not separately retrieved: CourtListener rate-limits the search API and the docket HTML returns 403, so this row establishes the case, court, docket number and defendant, not the text of the judgment or arrest entries.