Court filing
United States' Motion to Seal Superseding Indictment, Arrest Warrants and [Proposed] Order — United States of America v. BTC-E, a/k/a Canton Business Corporation, and Alexander Vinnik, Case No. CR 16-00227 SI
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, January 17, 2017. The BTC-e case caption and docket number: United States of America v. BTC-E, a/k/a Canton Business Corporation, and Alexander Vinnik, Case No. CR 16-00227 SI, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division; and that the superseding indictment was filed under seal on 17 January 2017 charging 18 U.S.C. 1960, 1956(h), 1956(a)(1), 1957 and forfeiture under 18 U.S.C. 982(a)(1)..
- Source type
- Court filing
- Published
- January 17, 2017
- Research grade
- P0
- Used in entries
- 0
Bibliographic record
- Publisher
- U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
- Published
- January 17, 2017
- Source type
- Court filing
- Research grade
- Source grade P0
- Language
- English
- Official record
- Official publication
- What it supports
- The BTC-e case caption and docket number: United States of America v. BTC-E, a/k/a Canton Business Corporation, and Alexander Vinnik, Case No. CR 16-00227 SI, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division; and that the superseding indictment was filed under seal on 17 January 2017 charging 18 U.S.C. 1960, 1956(h), 1956(a)(1), 1957 and forfeiture under 18 U.S.C. 982(a)(1).
- Dataset id
- src_nsarchive_us_v_btce_vinnik_motion_to_seal
Research notes
- Image-only scanned PDF, 28 pages, hosted by the National Security Archive at George Washington University. Text was not machine-extractable; pages were rendered and read visually.
- Pages 1-2 are the motion to seal and proposed order (signed by AUSA William Frentzen; ordered by Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim, dated January 17, 2017); page 3 onward is the sealed SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT itself, filed in open court the 17th day of January 2017.
- Filing stamp reads 2017 JAN 17 P 4:38, Clerk, U.S. District Court, No. Dist. of CA.
How this source is used
Cited 0 times across 0 record types.
The role on each citation records what the source was relied on for. A primary source establishes the fact, a supporting source corroborates it, technical evidence describes the infrastructure, and a later outcome records what happened afterwards.
Sources were reviewed to a research cutoff of August 23, 2026. Addresses recorded after that date are not reflected here.
Cited by
No record in the index cites this source yet.