Skip to main content
Back to the takedown index

Operation Onymous

November 2014, Darknet market
Led by Federal Bureau of Investigation

Verified core entry, last reviewed August 21, 2026

What was taken down?

Silk Road 2.0 hidden service seized; dozens of additional onion services seized or disabled; servers seized across multiple countries.[1][2][3]

See what happened

What happened to the people?

Officials reported 17 apprehended.
1 charged and 1 apprehended named in the public record.
Group accounted for: Partial

See people and accountability

Did it stay down?

Not established in the public record. No later activity is recorded against this entry.

See what happened afterward

Coordinated multinational action seizing Silk Road 2.0 and dozens of additional dark-web marketplaces and hidden services.[1][2][3]

Announced November 7, 2014.

Date
November 5 to November 7, 2014
Target
Silk Road 2.0 and additional Tor marketplaces, tor hidden service marketplaces
Activity
Darknet market, Criminal hosting and proxies
Operational lead
FBI
Partners
EC3, USAO-SDNY, and 1 more[1][2]
Jurisdiction
United States, European Union, United Kingdom, Germany, Netherlands, and France
Outcome
Silk Road 2.0 hidden service seized; dozens of additional onion services seized or disabled; servers seized across multiple countries.
Status
Completed
Legal mechanism
US seizure warrants (SDNY) plus parallel European judicial process coordinated via Europol EC3 and Eurojust
Group accounted for
Partial

Infrastructure

Onion services seized and servers seized, with no count in the record.

Identifier Recorded as Status Notes
Not published Onion service Seized Silk Road 2.0 plus dozens of additional dark market hidden services. Counts reported range from 27 to more than 400 addresses depending on source. CONFLICTING and not harmonized.[1][2]
Not published Server Seized Servers seized across multiple European countries.[2]

Domains and onion addresses are shown defanged. Where the record gives a count but no identifier, the count is shown in place of one. This list carries only what appears in the cited sources.

1
charged
1
apprehended

Named in the public record: 1 charged and 1 apprehended.

Figures count individuals named in charging documents and official statements, each person once per outcome. People alleged to be involved but not publicly identified are not counted.

Reported and named. Officials reported 17 apprehended. 1 charged and 1 apprehended named in the public record. The two figures come from different places and are never added together. Officials publish a headline total, and this index counts only the individuals it can name from the cited record.
Person Role Current public status
Alleged operator of Silk Road 2.0 ArrestedCharged
Charging authority
United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York
Main charges
Narcotics trafficking conspiracy; Computer hacking conspiracy; Trafficking in fraudulent identification documents conspiracy; Money laundering conspiracy
Case number
Not established in the public record
Arresting authority
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Arrest location
San Francisco, CA, United States
Extradition status
Not established in the public record
Conviction or plea
Not established in the public record
Sentence
Not established in the public record
Segment
Core operator
Sources
[1]

Blake Benthall

Alleged operator of Silk Road 2.0. Current public status: Arrested and Charged.

Charging authority
United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York
Main charges
Narcotics trafficking conspiracy; Computer hacking conspiracy; Trafficking in fraudulent identification documents conspiracy; Money laundering conspiracy
Case number
Not established in the public record
Arresting authority
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Arrest location
San Francisco, CA, United States
Extradition status
Not established in the public record
Conviction or plea
Not established in the public record
Sentence
Not established in the public record
Segment
Core operator
Sources
[1]

Rows expand to show charging authority, case identifiers, custody status, and sources.

Group accounted for: Partial

Arrests were made across several sites, but operator rosters for most seized services were never published.

Multiple independent marketplaces were targeted; no single finite operator group applies to the campaign as a whole.

See the organizations and roles behind this action

Blake Benthall prosecuted in SDNY.[1][2][3]

Not established in the public record. No later activity is recorded against this entry.

Return class E. The class is a research grading carried in the source dataset and its scale is not published, so this page relies on the relationship and confidence values instead. How this index handles it.

Numbered markers throughout this entry link to the source that supports the claim beside them.

Official sources

  1. [1]
    Operator Of Silk Road 2.0 Website Charged In Manhattan Federal Court

    United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York, November 6, 2014, Source grade P1

    Silk Road 2.0 seizure, Benthall arrest and charges, seizure of additional dark markets

    No address recorded for this source. Publisher, title, and date are given so it can be retrieved from the publisher.

  2. [2]
    Global action against dark markets on Tor network

    Europol, November 7, 2014, Source grade P2

    European component of Operation Onymous, arrest and server figures

    No address recorded for this source. Publisher, title, and date are given so it can be retrieved from the publisher.

Additional reporting and technical analysis

  1. [3]
    Contemporaneous reporting on Operation Onymous

    Major independent news organizations, November 7, 2014, Source grade S1

    Discrepancies in the reported number of seized hidden services

    No address recorded for this source. Publisher, title, and date are given so it can be retrieved from the publisher.

Coverage note.
  • Arrest count of 17 is an official aggregate reported at the time and is not reconciled with the single publicly named defendant record.
  • The method used to locate the hidden services was never disclosed and remains disputed.